"우리가 상대적이고 제약된 것으로부터 절대적이고 무제약적인 것으로의 기획을 시도하는 한, 우리는 독단주의와 회의주의 사이에서 흔들리는 추를 유지해야만 할 것이다. 이렇듯 점점 더 성가시게 흔들리는 추를 멈추는 유일한 방법은 철학이 무엇을 위해 유효한 것인지에 대한 우리의 개념을 바꾸는 것뿐이다."
리처드 로티의 Truth and Progress에 있다는데 책을 못 찾아서 전체 원문을 보고 싶습니다ㅜㅜ 있으신분 부탁드릴게요...
1개의 좋아요
이건가보네요(R. Rorty, Truth and Progress, p.4)
A lot of people still want philosophers to produce interesting answers to these questions. Such people will get nothing out of Nietzsche, James, Davidson, or the essays in this volume. Kant’s prognosis remains as sound as ever: as long as we try to project from the relative and conditioned to the absolute and unconditioned, we shall keep the pendulum swinging between dogmatism and skepticism. The only way to stop this increasingly tiresome pendulum swing is to change our conception of what philosophy is good for. But that is not something which will be accomplished by a few neat arguments. It will be accomplished, if it ever is, by a long, slow process of cultural change - that is to say, of change in common sense, changes in the intuitions available for being pumped up by philosophical arguments.
7개의 좋아요