니체 전공 박사 진학 추천 대학 리스트(2023)

출처: Brian Leiter 블로그

Where to go for PhD studies focused on Nietzsche, 2023 edition

The recommendations are premised on three assumptions about what is needed to do good PhD work on Nietzsche: (1) a strong, general philosophical education; (2) one or more serious Nietzsche scholars to supervise the work; and (3) a philosophical environment in which one can get a solid grounding in the history of philosophy, especially ancient philosophy, Kant, and post-Kantian German philosophy.

Unfortunately, there are fewer viable choices now than in the past. Here's the five programs I'd strongly recommend for someone certain they plan to focus on Nietzsche:

Brown University: a strong department overall (still top 20ish in the US), with one leading Nietzsche specialist, Bernard Reginster; unfortunately, two other senior faculty with sympathetic and complementary interests (Paul Guyer and Charles Larmore) have both retired. So Reginster is "more on his own" than before, but the department is still worth considering given Reginster's presence.

New York University: the best department in the Anglophone world, with three senior faculty with interests in Nietzsche: Robert Hopkins, John Richardson, and Tamsin Shaw (though only Richardson has worked on Nietzsche in recent years, and even these days he is focused on other topics). The department now also has strong coverage of ancient philosophy and through Richardson and Anja Jauernig solid coverage of Kant and the post-Kantian Continental traditions. Given the department's dominant strengths in other areas to date (e.g., metaphysics, philosophy of mind), so far there have been hardly any students there working on Nietzsche, and only a handful working on other post-Kantian figures--something a prospective student should investigate.

Oxford University: a very strong faculty (top 2-3 in the Anglophone world), with strong coverage of the history of philosophy, with one significant senior Nietzsche scholar (Peter Kail) and one strong younger Nietzsche specialist (Alexander Prescott-Couch). Stephen Mulhall, Joseph Schear and Mark Wrathall offer good coverage of other aspects of the post-Kantian Continental traditions, especially Heidegger and phenomenology. Also outstanding in ancient philosophy.

University of Chicago: a strong, if somewhat idiosyncratic, department (top 20ish in the US), with particular strengths in ancient Greek and Roman philosophy and in Kant and post-Kantian German philosophy. Chicago has to have more scholars interested in Nietzsche from more divergent points of view than anywhere else: besides me, also James Conant, Martha Nussbaum, Robert Pippin, David Wellbery, and (part-time still) Michael Forster. There tend to be a lot of graduate students interested in Nietzsche (six of the ten Chicago PhD students I've worked closely with over the last decade have had serious Nietzsche interests, two have published on Nietzsche, and another wrote a dissertation with a significant Nietzsche component). (Note: All of Pippin's supervision in German philosophy in recent years has been of students working on Kant or Hegel, and he is no longer supervising PhD students in the philosophy department.)

University of Warwick: a good department overall (top 10ish in the UK), with one well-known Nietzsche scholar (Andrew Huddleston) and one junior scholar working on Nietzsche (Timothy Stoll), plus strong coverage generally of Kant and the post-Kantian Continental traditions (e.g., Quassim Cassam, Stephen Houlgate).

Here are some other departments a student interested in Nietzsche might consider as well, although they are not as strong as the preceding in my judgment:

Boston University: a solid department (top 50ish in the US), with a strong commitment to the history of philosophy, including Kant and the post-Kantian Continental traditions (e.g., Daniel Dahlstrom, Sally Sedgwick). BU has one well-known Nietzsche specialist (Paul Katsafanas, though he is pushing a rather distinctive, and to my mind, implausible line about Nietzsche these days, though I still highly commend several of his earlier papers that we've discussed on this blog in the past--but students sympatico to his approach would no doubt find him an excellent person with whom to work).

Stanford University: a strong department (top 15 in the US), with two senior faculty who have done important work on Nietzsche: Lanier Anderson and Nadeem Hussain. In the past, I would have put Stanford in the top group, but Nadeem tells me he's not really working much on Nietzsche anymore. Also strong in ancient philosophy and, with Anderson and Michael Friedman, also very good for Kant. The department's center of gravity, judging from its PhD graduates, does appear to be more in logic, language, mind, metaphysics and epistemology.

University of California, Riverside: a solid department overall (top 30 in the US) and traditionally one of the best places in the U.S. to study the Continental traditions in philosophy with two important senior faculty--Maudemarie Clark (a leading Nietzsche specialist) and Pierre Keller (Kant, German Idealism, phenomenology)--as well as the recently tenured Sasha Newton (Kant, German Idealism) and Georgia Warnke (Critical Theory) in Political Science. The department is especially notable for the way in which the study of the Continental traditions is closely integrated with the study of the rest of philosophy, to the enrichment of both. (It's also a very collegial place, one of my favorite departments to visit in the country.) There is also a large and impressive group of graduate students working on the post-Kantian traditions and/or interested in Nietzsche. The problem now is that Clark will soon retire, and it's unclear whether the department will appoint another Nietzsche specialist.

University College London: a good department (top 10 in the UK), with two faculty who publish on Nietzsche: Sebastian Gardner and Tom Stern. Gardner is a major scholar of Kant and German Idealism. Gardner is excellent, Stern's work is weak.

University of Essex: a narrow department, but strongly focused on Kant and the post-Kantian Continental traditions. One well-known Nietzsche specialist on faculty: Beatrice Han-Pile.

University of Southampton: A solid but not top 15 UK department, with a particular strength in Schopenhauer and Nietzsche--most notably Christopher Janaway, but others in philosophy or cognate units include David Owen and Aaron Ridley.

Yale University: Robert Gooding-Williams is moving from Columbia to Yale, and he continues to be interested in Nietzsche, although much of his published work is on philosophy of race in recent years. The Department is strong in 19th-century German philosophy (Paul Franks, Jake McNulty), and also outstanding in the history of ancient Greek and Roman philosophy and modern philosophy.

For a student looking to do a terminal M.A. first, s/he might consider any of the UK departments (where students first do a master's degree or B.Phil. before doing the PhD), or, in the U.S., Georgia State University remains far and away the best choice: in addition to solid coverage of moral, political and legal philosophy, ancient philosophy, and philosophy of mind and cognitive science, the department has two well-known scholars who work on Nietzsche (Jessica Berry and Gregory Moore), and two other faculty who work on Kant and post-Kantian German philosophy (Sebastian Rand and Eric Wilson).

The best Nietzsche scholar on the European Continent is Mattia Riccardi, now at the University of Porto in Portugal. Also in Portugal, The New University of Lisbon continues to have a lively philosophical community interested in Nietzsche led by Joao Constancio. Andreas Urs Summer at the University of Freiburg in Germany is doing interesting historical and philological work, albeit of somewhat less clear philosophical import.

10개의 좋아요

좋은 정보 공유 감사드립니다. 니체는 물론이고 19세기 유럽철학 전공을 지망하는 분들에게도 도움이 많이 될 것 같습니다. 탑스쿨 혹은 적어도 중상위권인 학교들이 많네요!

1개의 좋아요

그래서 사실 리스트를 보고나니 못갈거같다는 불안감이 갑자기,, 하하하 :face_holding_back_tears:
절반 가까이가 영국인것도 문제구요..

1개의 좋아요

잘 읽었습니다. 시카고 대학교가 idiosyncratic하다고 하는 이유는 워낙 연구분야가 정해져있어서 그럴까요?

1개의 좋아요

저도 정확한 이유는 잘 모르겠어요..

1개의 좋아요

(1) 한 가지 이유를 추측하자면, 시카고대가 워낙...연구 분야/방식이 독특한? 괴짜 같은 교수가 많아서 그런 것 아닐까요?
정확한 이유는 저도 모르겠지만, 철학이든 사상사든 종교 연구든...시카고대 교수진의 연구 분야는 다른 대학 (그것도 특히 미국 상위권 대학)에사 보기 힘든, 도전적인? 연구 분야가 많더라고요.

브룩 지포린(Brook Ziporyn)은 정말 영미권에서 몇 안 되는 중국 불교/도교 사상사를 연구하는 사람이고, 댄 아놀드(Daniel Arnold)도 (지금에야 조금 흔한 경향이지만) 인도 철학과 분석 철학을 교섭해서 연구하는...아마 학자 경력 시작할 때는 굉장히 모험적인 커리어였을 것이라 추측하는 일을 했습니다.
게다가 메이저한 대학 치고는 현상학이나 정신분석학에 호의적인 학자들도 많고요. (예컨대, 장 뤽 마리옹도 여기 있고), 역으로 다른 유럽제 이론이 득세하는 학과들에는 분석 미학/인지과학적 접근을 하는 사람들을 꼭 한 두명씩 있게 하고요. (예컨대, 영화-미디어학과의 Maria Belodubrovskaya.)

그러면서도 다른 학교들은 필사적으로 따라가려고 하는 트렌드는 항상...이상하게 안 따라가기도 하죠. 다들 환경이랑 AI/뉴미디어 교수들을 엄청 끌어들이던데, 시카고대는...ㅋㅋㅋ 엄청 관심이 있는 것 같지는 않더라고요.

3개의 좋아요

애기 학부생입니다.
의도하신 건가 싶기는 한데, 프독 쪽 대학은 없는 게 신기하네요.
니체 같은 사람 공부하려면 영미는 가면 안된다 정도로만 러프하게 알고 있었는데 배워갑니다. 감사합니다.

하단에 보시면 프라이부르크 대학이 언급되고 있습니다. 또한 “헤겔은 독일이지!”라던가 “니체를 하는데 미국을 왜 가?” 같은 얘기가 이전에는 통했겠지만, 지금은 절대 아닙니다.

2개의 좋아요

미국이 헤겔은 따라잡았다는 말을 들었는데, 니체도 그랬는지는 몰랐네요. 미국이 좀 무서워지네요.

제 좁은 견문에서 보건데, 헤겔과 달리 니체 쪽은 연구자 풀이 별로 크지 않아서 사실 '어느 지역이 우세하다'라고 말하는 것이 얼마나 의미가 있나 싶기도합니다.

1개의 좋아요

그렇군요. 이것도 새로 배워갑니다.
많이 배우네요. 감사합니다.

다음 논문 제출을 위해서 Nietzsche-Studien이랑 Journal of Nietzsche 홈페이지를 들어갔다가, 니체 쪽에서 가장 큰 두 저널의 Editor 목록이 위 얘기에 어느정도 대답이 될 것 같아서 긁어옵니다.


1개의 좋아요