언어철학 관련 Reading List(Oxford Bibliographies)

Oxford Bibliography for Philosophy of Language

by Michael P. Wolf

GENERAL OVERVIEWS

Devitt, Michael, and Richard Hanley, eds. The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Language. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006.

Hale, Bob, and Crispin Wright, eds. A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1999.

Lepore, Ernest, and Barry C. Smith, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Wolf, Michael P. “Philosophy of Language URL: (Language, Philosophy of | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy).” In The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by James Fieser and Bradley Dowden. 2006.

TEXTBOOKS AND ANTHOLOGIES

Davidson, Matthew, ed. On Sense and Direct Reference: Readings in the Philosophy of Language. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2007.

Ludlow, Peter. Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997

Lycan, William G. Philosophy of Language: A Contemporary Introduction. 2d ed. Routledge Contemporary Introductions to Philosophy. New York: Routledge, 2008.

Lynch, Michael P., ed. The Nature of Truth: Classic and Contemporary Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.

Martinich, A. P., ed. The Philosophy of Language. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Miller, Alexander. Philosophy of Language. 2d ed. Fundamentals of Philosophy. London: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2007.

Morris, Michael. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

MAJOR FIGURES

Carnap, Rudolf. Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic. Alcester, UK: Read Books, 2008.

Frege, Gottlob. “On Sinn and Bedeutung.” In The Frege Reader. Edited by Michael Beaney, 151–171. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1997

Quine, Willard Van Orman. Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1960.

Russell, Bertrand. “On Denoting.” Mind 14 (1905): 479–493.

Sellars, Wilfrid. “Inference and Meaning.” Mind 62 (1953): 313–338.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by C. K. Ogden. New York: Dover 1998.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. 4th ed. Translated by P. M. S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.

THEORIES OF MEANING

Alston, William P. Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000.

Brandom, Robert B. Making It Explicit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.

Churchland, Paul. “Neurosemantics: On the Mapping of Minds and the Portrayal of Words.” In Neurophilosophy at Work. By Paul Churchland, 126–160. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Davidson, Donald. “Truth and Meaning.” In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. 2d ed. By Donald Davidson, 17–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

Dummett, Michael. “What Is a Theory of Meaning? (II).” In Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics. 2d ed. Edited by Gareth Evans and John McDowell, 67–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Fodor, Jerry. “Having Concepts: A Brief Refutation of the Twentieth Century.” Mind and Language 19.1 (2004): 29–47.

Grice, H. P. “Meaning.” Philosophical Review 66 (1957): 377–388.

Habermas, Jürgen. A Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon, 1985.

Horwich, Paul. Reflections on Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

THE NATURE OF LANGUAGE

Burge, Tyler. “Wherein Is Language Social?” In Foundations of Mind. Vol. 2. By Tyler Burge, 275–290. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

Chomsky, Noam. Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press, 1980.

Davidson, Donald. “A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs.” In Philosophical Grounds of Rationality. Edited by Richard E. Grandy and Richard Warner, 157–174. Oxford: Clarendon, 1986.

Lewis, David. “Languages and Language.” In Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1. By David Lewis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.

Millikan, Ruth Garrett. “Biosemantics.” Journal of Philosophy 86 (1989): 281–297.

Wiggins, David. “Languages as Social Objects.” Philosophy 72 (1997): 499–524.

RULE-FOLLOWING AND MEANING SKEPTICISM

Hattiangadi, Anandi. Oughts and Thoughts: Scepticism and the Normativity of Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

Kripke, Saul A. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.

Kusch, Martin. A Sceptical Guide to Meaning and Rules. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2006.

McDowell, John. “Wittgenstein on Following a Rule.” Synthese 58 (1984): 325–364.

Millikan, Ruth Garrett. “Truth Rules, Hoverflies, and the Kripke-Wittgenstein Paradox.” Philosophical Review 99.3 (1990): 323–353.

Wright, Crispin. Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.

TRUTH

Dummett, Michael. “Realism.” In Truth and Other Enigmas. By Michael Dummett, 145–165. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.

Grover, Dorothy L., Joseph L. Camp Jr., and Nuel D. Belnap Jr. “A Prosentential Theory of Truth.” Philosophical Studies 27 (1975): 73–124.

Horwich, Paul. Truth. 2d ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Tarski, Alfred. “The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4 (1944): 341–375.

Tarski, Alfred. “The Concept of Truth in the Languages of the Deductive Sciences.” In Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics: Papers from 1923 to 1938. 2d ed. Edited by John Corcoran. Translated by J. H. Woodger, 152–278. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1983

Wright, Crispin. “Minimalism and Deflationism.” In Saving the Differences: Essays on Themes from Truth and Objectivity. By Crispin Wright, 332–350. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.

ANALYTICITY

Ayer, Alfred Jules. Language, Truth, and Logic. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.

Boghossian, Paul. “Analyticity Reconsidered.” In Content and Justification: Philosophical Papers. By Paul Boghossian, 195–224. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Fodor, Jerry, and Ernest Lepore. Holism: A Shopper’s Guide. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1992.

Quine, Willard van Orman. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” In From a Logical Point of View: Nine Logico-Philosophical Essays. 2d rev. ed. By Willard van Orman Quine, 20–46. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.

Williamson, Timothy. “Conceptual Truth.” Aristotelian Society supp. 80 (2006): 1–41.

DIRECT REFERENCE AND RIGID DESIGNATION

Berger, Alan. Terms and Truth: Reference Direct and Anaphoric. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002

Chalmers, David J. “On Sense and Intension.” Philosophical Perspectives 16 (2002): 135–182.

Devitt, Michael. “Against Direct Reference.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 14 (1989): 206–240.

Kripke, Saul A. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.

Putnam, Hilary. “The Meaning of Meaning.” In Mind, Language, and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2. By Hilary Putnam, 215–271. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1975.

Wolf, Michael P. “Rigid Designation and Anaphoric Theories of Reference.” Philosophical Studies 130 (2006): 351–375.

INDEXICALS AND DEMONSTRATIVES

Borg, Emma. “Complex Demonstratives.” Philosophical Studies 97 (2000): 225–244.

Brandom, Robert B. Between Saying and Doing: Towards an Analytic Pragmatism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Evans, Gareth. The Varieties of Reference. Edited by John McDowell. Oxford: Clarendon, 1982.

Kaplan, David. “Dthat.” In Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 2, Pragmatics. Edited by Peter Cole, 221–253. New York: Academic Press, 1978.

Kaplan, David. “Demonstratives.” In Themes from Kaplan. Edited by Joseph Almog, John Perry, and Howard Wettstein, 481–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.

May, Robert. “Frege on Indexicals.” Philosophical Review 115 (2006): 487–516.

McDowell, John. “De Re Senses.” Philosophical Quarterly 34 (1984): 283–294.

Perry, John. “The Problem of the Essential Indexical.” Noûs 13 (1979): 3–21.

PROPOSITIONAL ATTITUDES

Brandom, Robert B. Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.

Burge, Tyler. “Belief De Re.” Journal of Philosophy 74 (1977): 338–362.

Davidson, Donald. “On Saying That.” Synthese 19 (1968): 130–146.

Kripke, Saul. “A Puzzle about Belief.” In Meaning and Use: Papers Presented at the Second Jerusalem Philosophical Encounter, April 1976. Edited by Avishai Margalit, 239–283. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel, 1979.

Richard, Mark. “Direct Reference and Ascriptions of Belief.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 12 (1983): 425–452.

Schiffer, Stephen. “Descriptions, Indexicals, and Belief Reports: Some Dilemmas (but Not the Ones You Expect).” In Direct Reference, Indexicality, and Propositional Attitudes. Edited by Wolfgang Künne, Albert Newen, and Martin Anduschus, 247-276. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 1997

SPEECH ACTS

Austin, J. L. How to Do Things with Words. 2d ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975.

Bach, Kent, and Robert M. Harnish. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1979.

Davis, Wayne A. Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Grice, Paul. “Logic and Conversation.” In Studies in the Way of Words. By Paul Grice, 22–40, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.

Kukla, Rebecca, and Mark Lance. Yo and Lo! The Pragmatic Topography of the Space of Reasons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.

Saul, Jennifer M. “Speaker Meaning, What Is Said, and What Is Implicated.” Noûs 36 (2002): 228–248.

‣Searle, John R. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1970.

METAPHOR

Camp, Elizabeth. “Contextualism, Metaphor, and What Is Said.” Mind and Language 21.3 (2006): 280–309.

Davidson, Donald. “What Metaphors Mean.” In On Metaphor. Edited by Sheldon Sacks, 29–46. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978.

Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. “Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language.” Journal of Philosophy 77 (1980): 453–486.

Stern, Josef. “Metaphor, Literal, Literalism.” Mind and Language 21.3 (2006): 243–279.

MINIMALISM AND CONTEXTUALISM IN SEMANTICS

Atlas, Jay David. “Meanings, Propositions, Context, and Semantical Underdeterminacy.” In Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism: New Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics. Edited by Gerhard Preyer and Georg Peter, 217–239. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

Borg, Emma. “Minimalism versus Contextualism in Semantics.” In Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism: New Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics. Edited by Gerhard Preyer and Georg Peter, 339–360. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

Cappelen, Herman, and Ernie Lepore. Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2005.

MacFarlane, John. “Semantic Minimalism and Nonindexical Contextualism.” In Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism: New Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics. Edited by Gerhard Preyer and Georg Peter, 240–250. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

Stanley, Jason. “On the Linguistic Basis for Contextualism.” Philosophical Studies 119 (2004): 119–146.

Travis, Charles. “Meaning’s Role in Truth.” Mind 105 (1996): 451–466.


인터넷에서 구한 reading list입니다. 옥스포드에서 이렇게 Oxford Bibliographies라는 이름으로 분야별로 참고문헌 리스트를 만들던데, 각 세부분야에서 논의를 잘 조망하거나 대표적이고 essential한 논문들을 소개해주고 있어서 초심자에게 굉장히 좋은 것 같습니다. 앞으로 각자 이런 공신력 있는 추천 문헌 목록을 발견한다면 서로 공유해도 좋을 것 같네요.

PS. 목록에 셀라스, 브랜덤, 맥도웰, 맥팔레인 등의 이름이 종종 나온다 했더니, 비블리오그래피를 작성한 Michael Wolf가 자연종명사에 관한 추론주의 의미론으로 박사를 한 철학자였네요. 역시...

5개의 좋아요

저는 제 공부 분야인 니체와 푸코의 것을 사서 가지고 있는데, 저작권 문제가 좀 마음에 걸리네요.

홈페이지에는 단체나 기관을 대상으로 구독권을 판매한다고 명시돼 있던데, 혹시 개별 구매도 가능한가요?

아 저는 아마존에서 kindle(e-book)형태로 구매했어요. 종이책의 경우엔 저도 잘 모르겠네요.찾아보니 푸코는 저도 인터넷에서 구한것이네요.

1개의 좋아요

아마존에서 살 수 있군요. 여차하면 한번 구매를 생각해봐야겠네요. 정보 감사합니다.

근데 제 기억에 모든 bibliographies가 kindle로 나온것은 아닌거 같더라구요. 제 경우엔, 공부 분야인 아도르노랑 푸코가 킨들판으로 없었던거 같습니다. 관심있는 분야 한번 찾아보세요!

1개의 좋아요

잘 봤습니다. 하지만 언어철학에 대한 표준적이고 입문적인 reading list라 할 수 있는가 하는 점에서는 약간 찝찝한 느낌이 있긴 하네요.. 제 생각으로는 표준적이라기보다는 현재 기준에서 어느정도 언어철학에 대한 기본적인 논의를 쌓은 다음에 조금 더 좁은 주제로 들어갈 때 건드려볼만한 논문들인 것 같아요. Truth 파트도 최소주의쪽에 좀 치중된 측면이 있지 않나 싶구요. (물론 모든 reading list가 어느정도 optionated한건 어쩔 수 없지만요)

또 의아한 게, 가능세계 의미론은 theories of meaning 카테고리에서 전혀 소개가 안 되고 있는 것 같네요. 주류이기 때문에 소개되어야 한다는 생각은 하지 않습니다만 그래도 카테고리에서 배제되어야 할 이유가 딱히 없어보이는데 말이죠.. 가능세계 의미론 많관부..

교과서 목록에 Zoltan Szabo Gendler, Richmond Thomasson 공저의 Philosophy of Language (Cambridge University Press)도 하나 끼워넣어봅니다.

2개의 좋아요

확실히 리딩 리스트에는 저자의 관심사와 성향이 진하게 묻어나는가 봅니다. Truth 카테고리에도 진리 대문장 이론이라든가 축소주의 같은 건 브랜덤이 차용했던 이론이고, 다른 카테고리들도 마찬가지로... 말씀대로 조금 더 다양한 입장이나 주제들을 반영하는 논문들을 더 소개해줬으면 좋았을 것 같습니다. 예컨대 말씀하신 가능세계 의미론 같은 경우는 개인적으로 흥미가 동해서 찾아보고 있었는데, 리딩 리스트에서 찾을 수 있었으면 더 좋았을 텐데요. Theories of Meaning에 하버마스의 『의사소통행위이론』이 들어갈 필요가 있었는지...도 잘 모르겠습니다.

Gendler와 Thomasson의 책은 특이하게 의미론, 화용론, 의미에 관한 철학적 논의 순으로 짜여 있네요. 추천 감사합니다!

좋은 문헌 목록이지만, 위 논의와 같은 맥락에서 좀 '고전적'이라는 느낌을 받습니다. 물론 고전적인 주제는 중요하지만, 또 해당 목록이 '현재 업계에서 가장 핫한 주제들'로 받아들여지면 그건 또 오해를 빚는걸테니까요.

이를테면 지난 10년 간 언어철학계에서 가장 많이 논의되었던 주제들로는 인식적 양상(epistemic modal), 집단혐오용어(slur) 같은게 있을텐데, 이쪽 관련 문헌은 해당 목록에 포함되어 있는 것 같지 않습니다.

재차 언급하다시피 해당 문헌들은 고전으로서 해당 분야 업계인들은 분명히 잘 숙지해야하는 문헌이라고 봅니다만, 또 이게 '2010-2020년대의 주요 연구 현황'으로 오해를 받으면 곤란하니까요.

1개의 좋아요